MACROECONOMIC ASSESSMENT: CONTENT AND FEATURES OF APPLICATION IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-81-31-38Keywords:
macroeconomic evaluation, macroeconomic analysis, macroeconomic models, economic uncertainty, macroeconomic evaluation toolsAbstract
This article addresses the scientific problem of identifying macroeconomic assessment as one of the important areas of modern economic research. The development of this area ensures the adoption of more informed decisions in the formation and implementation of macroeconomic policy. The relevance of this area of research for the Ukrainian economy and society is also enhanced by significant imbalances and the danger of critical destabilization of the economy during the active phase of the war. The article explains the difference between macroeconomic assessment and macroeconomic analysis, and also emphasizes what unites them. Attention is drawn to the fact that macroeconomic assessment, to a greater extent, tends to the analysis of the "ex post" type. In contrast, macroeconomic analysis is, mainly, an analysis of the "ex ante" type. Both types of macroeconomic analysis are necessary and interrelated. Using a specific example of a model in which the influence of factors on GDP dynamics is assessed, a generalization is made about the content of macroeconomic assessment. It is proven that the "chaotic" selection of model predictors, that is, selection without using theoretical constructs of macroeconomic science, deprives econometric models of the ability to be the basis for predictions. The following methods were used in the study: comparison of theoretical and applied approaches in macroeconomic analysis and macroeconomic evaluation, system analysis, regression analysis. Generalizations were made regarding which of the tools provide the opportunity to achieve the best results in evaluating the economy in a state of high uncertainty. It is substantiated that such tools are macroeconomic evaluation based on vector autoregression (VAR) models, logistic regression models, artificial neural network models. It is the evaluation based on the mentioned tools that makes it possible to take into account the possibility of variability of events, the influence of unpredictable factors, and to take into account non-obvious (hidden) dependencies between macroeconomic variables.
Downloads
References
Arias, J. E., Rubio-Ramírez, J. F., & Shin, M. (2022). Macroeconomic forecasting and variable ordering in multivariate stochastic volatility models. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1054–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.04.013
Barnichon, R., & Matthes, C. (2018). Functional approximation of impulse responses. Journal of Monetary Economics, 99, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.04.013
Coenen G., Mazelis F., Motto R., Ristiniemi A. (2025). Inflation and monetary policy in medium-sized New Keynesian DSGE models. Europian Central Bank/ Working Paper Series. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp3137~e458bce069.en.pdf
Coulombe P. G., Leroux, M., Stevanovic, D., & Surprenant, S. (2022). How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(5), 920–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2910
Gangopadhyay, P., Pradhan, R. P., & Das, N. (2024). Asymmetric shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Australian stock market: Evidence from multiple threshold nonlinear ARDL (MTNARDL) approach. International Economics, 179, 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100533
Jabeur, S. B. (2017). Bankruptcy prediction using partial least squares logistic regression. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.005.
Li, Z. (2017). Political trust and public satisfaction: A logistic regression analysis based on 1113 samples. Open Journal of Business and Management, 5, 208-214. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2017.51019
Olawoyin, Anifat & Chen, Yangjuin. (2018). Predicting the Future with Artificial Neural Network. Procedia Computer Science. 140. 383-392. 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.300.
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center. https://www.euacademic.org/BookUpload/9.pdf
Salter A.W. (2022) Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply: Keep It Simple. Daily Economy, Novemder 28, 2022 https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/aggregate-demand-and-aggregate-supply-keep-it-simple-stupid/
Trading Economics. (n.d.). Ukraine GDP per capita PPP. https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/gdp-per-capita-ppp
World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators. DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Xie, Huaqing & Xu, Xingcheng & Yan, Fangjia & Qian, Xun & Yang, Yanqing. (2024). Deep Learning for Multi-Country GDP Prediction: A Study of Model Performance and Data Impact. 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02551.
Акулов, О., & Радіонова, І. (2025). Застосування штучних нейронних мереж для аналізу впливу ІТ-сектору на економічне зростання в Україні. Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University Economics, (2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2025-2-1 https://journals.chnu.chernivtsi.ua/index.php/econom/article/view/249
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.