MACROECONOMIC ASSESSMENT: CONTENT AND FEATURES OF APPLICATION IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-81-31-38

Keywords:

macroeconomic evaluation, macroeconomic analysis, macroeconomic models, economic uncertainty, macroeconomic evaluation tools

Abstract

This article addresses the scientific problem of identifying macroeconomic assessment as one of the important areas of modern economic research. The development of this area ensures the adoption of more informed decisions in the formation and implementation of macroeconomic policy. The relevance of this area of research for the Ukrainian economy and society is also enhanced by significant imbalances and the danger of critical destabilization of the economy during the active phase of the war. The article explains the difference between macroeconomic assessment and macroeconomic analysis, and also emphasizes what unites them. Attention is drawn to the fact that macroeconomic assessment, to a greater extent, tends to the analysis of the "ex post" type. In contrast, macroeconomic analysis is, mainly, an analysis of the "ex ante" type. Both types of macroeconomic analysis are necessary and interrelated. Using a specific example of a model in which the influence of factors on GDP dynamics is assessed, a generalization is made about the content of macroeconomic assessment. It is proven that the "chaotic" selection of model predictors, that is, selection without using theoretical constructs of macroeconomic science, deprives econometric models of the ability to be the basis for predictions. The following methods were used in the study: comparison of theoretical and applied approaches in macroeconomic analysis and macroeconomic evaluation, system analysis, regression analysis. Generalizations were made regarding which of the tools provide the opportunity to achieve the best results in evaluating the economy in a state of high uncertainty. It is substantiated that such tools are macroeconomic evaluation based on vector autoregression (VAR) models, logistic regression models, artificial neural network models. It is the evaluation based on the mentioned tools that makes it possible to take into account the possibility of variability of events, the influence of unpredictable factors, and to take into account non-obvious (hidden) dependencies between macroeconomic variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iryna Radionova, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine, Professor of the Department of Economics and Finance, KROK University, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Arias, J. E., Rubio-Ramírez, J. F., & Shin, M. (2022). Macroeconomic forecasting and variable ordering in multivariate stochastic volatility models. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1054–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.04.013

Barnichon, R., & Matthes, C. (2018). Functional approximation of impulse responses. Journal of Monetary Economics, 99, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.04.013

Coenen G., Mazelis F., Motto R., Ristiniemi A. (2025). Inflation and monetary policy in medium-sized New Keynesian DSGE models. Europian Central Bank/ Working Paper Series. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp3137~e458bce069.en.pdf

Coulombe P. G., Leroux, M., Stevanovic, D., & Surprenant, S. (2022). How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(5), 920–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2910

Gangopadhyay, P., Pradhan, R. P., & Das, N. (2024). Asymmetric shocks of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Australian stock market: Evidence from multiple threshold nonlinear ARDL (MTNARDL) approach. International Economics, 179, 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100533

Jabeur, S. B. (2017). Bankruptcy prediction using partial least squares logistic regression. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.005.

Li, Z. (2017). Political trust and public satisfaction: A logistic regression analysis based on 1113 samples. Open Journal of Business and Management, 5, 208-214. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2017.51019

Olawoyin, Anifat & Chen, Yangjuin. (2018). Predicting the Future with Artificial Neural Network. Procedia Computer Science. 140. 383-392. 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.300.

Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center. https://www.euacademic.org/BookUpload/9.pdf

Salter A.W. (2022) Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply: Keep It Simple. Daily Economy, Novemder 28, 2022 https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/aggregate-demand-and-aggregate-supply-keep-it-simple-stupid/

Trading Economics. (n.d.). Ukraine GDP per capita PPP. https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/gdp-per-capita-ppp

World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators. DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Xie, Huaqing & Xu, Xingcheng & Yan, Fangjia & Qian, Xun & Yang, Yanqing. (2024). Deep Learning for Multi-Country GDP Prediction: A Study of Model Performance and Data Impact. 10.48550/arXiv.2409.02551.

Акулов, О., & Радіонова, І. (2025). Застосування штучних нейронних мереж для аналізу впливу ІТ-сектору на економічне зростання в Україні. Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University Economics, (2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2025-2-1 https://journals.chnu.chernivtsi.ua/index.php/econom/article/view/249

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Radionova, I. (2026). MACROECONOMIC ASSESSMENT: CONTENT AND FEATURES OF APPLICATION IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY. Science Notes of KROK University, (1(81), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-81-31-38