CORPORATE APPROACHES TO MANAGING BUSINESS RESOURCES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-82-10-19Keywords:
corporate governance, resources, enterprises, governance model, economic indicators, barriers, sustainable development, ESG, circular economyAbstract
The article examines the pressing scientific and practical issue of transforming corporate approaches to enterprise resource management in the context of sustainable development, driven by the depletion of natural resources, stricter environmental regulations, and growing investor demands for ESG transparency in business. In the face of global environmental challenges, dwindling resources, and stricter regulatory requirements for businesses, traditional linear models of resource use are becoming ineffective. Ukrainian enterprises are confronted with the need to transform their management approaches to resource use by integrating the principles of sustainable development, the circular economy, and social responsibility. However, there is a lack of systematic research that would synthesize corporate experience and propose practical models tailored to Ukrainian realities. The aim of this study is to provide a theoretical and methodological justification for corporate approaches to enterprise resource management based on sustainable development and to develop practical recommendations for their implementation. The object of the study is the processes of enterprise resource management in the context of the transition to a circular economy model. The theoretical foundation of the study consists of the concepts of sustainable development, the circular economy, and ESG management. The study employs general scientific methods: systems analysis – to determine the structure of resource flows; comparative analysis – to evaluate traditional and innovative models; and the method of scientific abstraction and logical generalization – to formulate conclusions. A three-level classification of corporate resource management models is proposed. Key implementation tools are systematized – methodological (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA), technological (IIoT, digital twins), and organizational (ESG committees, “green” procurement, internal carbon pricing). Major barriers and ways to overcome them are identified. The developed recommendations can be used by enterprises for the phased implementation of sustainable resource management, improving resource efficiency, and accessing “green” financing.
Downloads
References
Багорка, Д., & Верцева, А. (2024). УПРАВЛІННЯ БІЗНЕС-ПРОЦЕСАМИ ТА МЕТОДИ ЇХ ВДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ ДЛЯ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ІННОВАЦІЙНОГО РОЗВИТКУ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ. Економіка та суспільство, 66. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-40
Борисяк, О., & Вовчук, Д. (2023). НИЗЬКОВУГЛЕЦЕВІ КРИТИЧНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ В УКРАЇНІ ТА ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОМУ СОЮЗІ: КЛІМАТИЧНЕ І ЦИРКУЛЯРНЕ УПРАВЛІННЯ РЕСУРСАМИ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ. Підприємництво та інновації, 29, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/29.8
Bigolin, E., R.Rossetto, F.Corsini, & M.Frey. (2025). THE INTEGRATION OF THE WATER-ENERGY-FOOD NEXUS FRAMEWORK INTO CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7490-7509. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70090
Bloomberg. (2025). Economics. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/
Dang, T.T.T., Hoang, T.G., Majo, A.M., Pandey, P., & Binh, A.D.T. (2025). REVOLUTIONIZING CIRCULAR BUSINESS PRACTICES WITH WASTE REDUCTION AND RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION. The Synergistic Effect of Sustainable Business Practices on Corporate Performance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3375-3_10
McKinsey & Company. (2025). Global management consulting firm. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/
Matviienko, H., Pylypenko, O., Putintsev, A., Chumak, O., Gordiichuk, S. (2022). EUROPEAN UNION POLICY ON FINANCING ECO-INNOVATIONS IN THE TRANSITION TO A GREEN ECONOMY. Cuest. Polít. 40, 28-48. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4075.01
Мінекономіки. (2026). Розвиток підприємництва. URL: https://me.gov.ua/?lang=uk-UA
Ramani, V. & De Giovanni, P. (2026). CIRCULAR ECONOMY BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND PUBLIC SCHEMES: A GAME THEORY-BASED SURVEY. Intl. Trans. in Op. Res., 33, 2827-2869. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.70031
Румик, І., Плетенецька, С., & Царенок, О. (2023). ОСОБЛИВОСТІ УПРАВЛІННЯ ФІНАНСОВИМИ РЕСУРСАМИ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ В УМОВАХ ВОЄННОГО СТАНУ. Вчені записки Університету «КРОК», 4(72), 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2023-72-9-19
Світовий банк. (2025). URL: https://www.worldbank.org/ext/uk/country/ukraine
Стусь, Ю., & Чумаченко, О. (2024). УПРАВЛІННЯ ФІНАНСОВИМИ РЕСУРСАМИ ПІДПРИЄМСТВА. Вчені записки Університету «КРОК», 4(76), 80-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2024-76-80-89
Stead, J.G. (2026). Flourishing Circularity: A Resource Assessment Framework for Sustainable Strategic Management. Sustainability, 18(2), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020867
Чумаченко, О., Плетенецька, С., & Антонець, Т. (2024). УПРАВЛІННЯ ФІНАНСОВИМ СТАНОМ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ У СИСТЕМІ СТРАТЕГІЧНОГО МЕНЕДЖМЕНТУ. Вчені записки Університету «КРОК», 1(73), 54-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2024-73-54-65
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.