BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF COGNITIVE ECONOMY IN CONSUMER CHOICE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-82-204-213

Keywords:

cognitive economy, consumer behavior, consumer choice, information overload, excessive assortment, heuristics, illusion of freedom of choice, automated consumption scenarios, impulsive purchases, digital consumer environment

Abstract

The article addresses consumer decision-making in an environment where expanding assortments, intensive marketing signals, and the development of digital services make fully rational product comparison increasingly difficult. Under these conditions, consumers seek to reduce the burden on attention, memory, and time; therefore, they more often rely on simple cues, repeated purchasing patterns, and technology-based prompts. The study aims to reveal cognitive economy as a behavioral mechanism that helps consumers make decisions more quickly, while also creating risks of impulsivity and dependence on an externally shaped choice environment. The object of the study is consumer behavior under conditions of information saturation, excessive choice, visual influence, service convenience, and digital automation of purchasing. The empirical basis consists of an anonymous online survey of 108 respondents, combining closed-ended Likert-scale questions with open-ended responses. The study applies analysis and synthesis, comparison, systematization, descriptive statistics, correlation and covariance analysis, and content analysis of respondents’ responses. The results show that color, packaging design, brand recognizability, and interface cues may operate as cognitive reference points, reducing choice time and strengthening subjective confidence in the decision. At the same time, these stimuli do not always promote rationality, as they may trigger impulsive purchases. The study also demonstrates that consumers attach considerable importance to delivery convenience, saving physical effort, automated services, and repeat purchases, especially when the choice process becomes complex or emotionally exhausting. The analysis of open-ended responses revealed that 65% of respondents associate freedom of choice primarily with independence, clarity, control, and the absence of intrusive influence, rather than merely with the number of available products. The practical value of the study lies in the potential to use its findings to help consumers assess marketing stimuli more critically and to guide businesses in developing convenient, structured, and ethically balanced solutions that simplify choice without manipulative influence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olena Naumova, KROK University

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Marketing and Economic Behavior, «KROK» University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Viktoriia Barys, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

First-level higher education applicant, specialty 072 “Finance”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Jiang, H., Zeng, J., & Cai, J. (2026). From emotional arousal to diminished cognitive control: How configurations of beauty streamer characteristics shape consumer impulse buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 90, 104713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104713

He, S., Blasch, J., van Beukering, P., & Wang, J. (2022). Energy labels and heuristic decision-making: The role of cognition and energy literacy. Energy Economics, 114, 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106279

Barkemeyer, R., Young, C. W., Chintakayala, P. K., & Owen, A. (2023). Eco-labels, conspicuous conservation and moral licensing: An indirect behavioural rebound effect. Ecological Economics, 204 (Part A), 107649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107649

Park, J. Y., & Jang, S. S. (2013). Confused by too many choices? Choice overload in tourism. Tourism Management, 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.05.004

Dar, A.R., Gul, M. (2025), "The “less is better” paradox and consumer behaviour: a systematic review of choice overload and its marketing implications". Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 28 No. 1 pp. 122–145, https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2024-0006

Chen, Y., & Yang, Z. (2020). The behavioral analysis of choice difficulty states during clothing online shopping. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 33(4), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-12-2019-0189

Cooke, A. D. J., Meyvis, T., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-Timing Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1086/319620

Ven, M., Doucé, L., Willems, K. et al. Augmenting the reality of decision-making: Comparing and combining product experiences’ influence on choice difficulty and mental imagery. Electron Markets 35, 54 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00801-y

Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. (1991). Consumer decision making. In J. Payne, J. R. Bettman, & E. J. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behaviour (pp. 50–84).

Jacob, B. M., Thomas, S., & Joseph, J. (2024). Over two decades of research on choice overload: An overview and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), Article e13029. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13029

Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 993-1015. https://doi.org/10.1086/673521

Peng M, Xu Z and Huang H (2021) How Does Information Overload Affect Consumers’ Online Decision Process? An Event-Related Potentials Study. Front. Neurosci. 15:695852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.695852

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Naumova, O., & Barys, V. (2026). BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF COGNITIVE ECONOMY IN CONSUMER CHOICE. Science Notes of KROK University, (2(82), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-82-204-213

Issue

Section

Chapter 2. Management and administration