METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ANALYSING A COMPANY'S ESG PROFILE IN THE CONTEXT OF ENSURING ORGANISATIONAL RESILIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2026-81-165-177Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, ESG concept, sustainable development, environmental responsibility, internal corporate responsibility, social efficiency, responsibility to communities, corporate governance, corporate volunteering, circular economy, decarbonization, organisational resilience of companiesAbstract
The article examines the current issues of integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the activities of leading international companies under modern conditions and their reflection in rating systems. The aim of the article is a comprehensive analysis of methodologies for assessing the ESG performance of international companies, taking into account industry specifics, environmental, social and governance factors. The formation of research methods is based on the analysis of publicly available ESG indicators of leading international companies from various sectors of the economy. Also, on the use of a systematic approach to data processing and interpretation, which allows comparing indicators of efficiency, risk and transparency of company management. The basis of the comprehensive methodology is a comparative analysis of key ESG rating systems (LSEG Refinitiv, ESG Book, Sustainalytics, MSCI ESG Rating), which combines an assessment of the actual effectiveness of ESG policies and risks with an analysis of the structural components of rating methodologies. The research methodology included an analysis of open ESG reports, aggregated rating data, and a comparative analysis of the environmental, social, and governance indicators of seven leading companies from different sectors of the economy (consumer goods, consumer durables, technology, finance, mining, and services). It was found that industry specifics significantly determine both direct and indirect environmental impacts of companies, with companies in manufacturing sectors having significant indirect emissions through supply chains, technology companies having high Scope 3 through digital operations, and financial companies demonstrating low direct and indirect emissions, focusing on managing ESG risks. The comparison of methodologies showed that LSEG Refinitiv is most focused on assessing management consistency and transparency of information disclosure, ESG Book – on the comprehensive integration of impact and risks using artificial intelligence, Sustainalytics – on financially significant ESG risks, and MSCI ESG Rating – on industry context and material challenges. The novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive comparison of ESG effectiveness assessment methodologies together with the industry characteristic of environmental impact, which makes it possible to identify differentiated strategies for manufacturing, technological and financial companies. An important future task is the development of new research methodologies and the search for ways to productively apply the latest technologies for the development of ESG-oriented business.
Downloads
References
3i Group plc. (2023). Sustainability Report 2023. 3i Group plc. https://www.3i.com/media/c3kjfzx4/3i-sustainabilityreport-2023.pdf
3i Group plc. (2025). External benchmarking – Sustainability ratings. 3i Group plc. https://www.3i.com/sustainability/external-benchmarking/
Adobe Inc. (2023). Adobe Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2023. Adobe. https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/cc/en/corporate-responsibility/pdfs/Adobe-CSR-Report-2023.pdf
Adobe Inc. (2024). Sustainability. Adobe. https://www.adobe.com/corporate-responsibility/sustainability.html
Bannikov, P., & Grishnova, O. (2025). Methodology and practice of assessing the impact of ESG measures on the efficiency of corporate activities of companies. Social and labour relations: theory and practice, 15(2), 1-10. doi:10.21511/slrtp.15(2).2025.01
Available from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/1c30116d-f9c4-4cb4-9029-ad8efd11fda5/content
Berg, F., Kölbel, J., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26, 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
Cisco Systems Inc. (2023). FY23 Purpose Report. Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/about/csr/esg-hub/_pdf/purpose-report-2023.pdf
ESG Book. (2025). ESG Performance Score Methodology. ESG Book. https://www.docs.esgbook.com/esg-performance-score/ ESG Book
ESG Book. (2025). Top 100 ESG Companies. ESG Book. https://www.docs.esgbook.com/insights/esg-insights/esg-book-top-100/
FII Institute. (2022). Inclusive ESG Framework and Scoring Methodology. FII Institute / ESG Book. https://www.docs.esgbook.com/inclusive-esg/ ESG Book
Kharazishvili, Y., Bilan, Y., Sukhodolia, O., Grishnova, O., & Mishchuk, H. (2025). Scientific and strategic foresighting: The trajectory of sustainable development (on the example of Ukraine's energy security). Sustainable Futures, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100580
L’Oréal S.A. (2024). Universal Registration Document 2024. L’Oréal. https://www.loreal-finance.com/eng/2024-universal-registration-document/en/article/20/
L’Oréal S.A. (2024). Sustainalytics Ratings (ESG Risk). L’Oréal. https://www.loreal.com/en/articles/commitments/external-recognitions-sustainalytics-page/
LSEG Data & Analytics. (2025). LSEG ESG Scores Methodology. LSEG. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/sustainable-finance/esg-scores lseg.com
MSCI ESG Research LLC. (2025). MSCI ESG Government Ratings Methodology. MSCI. https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/34424357/MSCI%2BESG%2BGovernment%2BRatings%2BMethodology.pdf msci.com
Newmont Corporation. (2023). 2023 Sustainability Report. Newmont. https://s24.q4cdn.com/382246808/files/doc_downloads/2023/sustainability/newmont-2023-sustainability-report.pdf
Newmont Corporation. (2025). Newmont Publishes 2024 Sustainability and Taxes & Royalties Reports. Newmont. https://www.newmont.com/investors/news-release/news-details/2025/Newmont-Publishes-2024-Sustainability-and-Taxes--Royalties-Reports/default.aspx
Pedrosa Soares, C. (2024). Leveraging natural language and item response theory models for ESG scoring. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20377
Sustainalytics / Morningstar. (2024). ESG Risk Ratings Methodology Abstract (ver. 3.1). Sustainalytics. https://www.sustainalytics.com/docs/knowledgehublibraries/default-document-library/sustainalytics_-esg-risk-ratings_-version-3-1_-methodology-abstract_-june-2024.pdf sustainalytics.com
Swatch Group Ltd. (2024). Sustainability Report 2024. Swatch Group. https://www.swatchgroup.com/en/sustainability-report
Visa Inc. (2023). 2023 Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report. Visa. https://usa.visa.com/content/dam/VCOM/regional/na/us/about-visa/documents/2023-corporate-responsibility-sustainability-report.pdf
Алькема, В. (2024). Методичні підходи до оцінки ділової репутації підприємства: забезпечення економічної безпеки та сталого розвитку. Вчені записки Університету «КРОК», 4(76), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2024-76-90-95
Алькема, В. Г. (2025). Стратегії формування ділової репутації промислових підприємств в умовах цифровізації. Економіка та суспільство, 71. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-71-152
Ганусич, В. О., & Ганусич, К. С. (2025). Аналіз ESG рейтингу технологічних компаній, акції яких торгуються на фондовому ринку, з метою прийняття інвестиційних рішень. Економічна наука, 2, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2025.2.173
Диба, М., & Гернего, Ю. (2022). Урахування принципів ESG при формуванні системи міжнародних рейтингів. Фінанси України, 1, 90–102. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Iuliia-Gernego/publication/360481032_ESG_principles_applied_in_forming_the_system_of_international_ratings/links/63ea8fe54dcb750da75713af/ESG-principles-applied-in-forming-the-system-of-international-ratings.pdf
Корчагіна, Л. (2023). Науково методичні засади побудови механізму управління ESG активністю на підприємстві. Економіка та суспільство, 35, 45–59. https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2588
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.