ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A FACILITATOR OF UNCERTAINTY: THE TRANSITIONAL SPACE OF HUMAI INTERACTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-80-342-352

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, uncertainty, buffer zone of development, transitional space, hybrid intelligence, HUMAI, posthumanism, Eco-Centered Psychological Facilitation (ECPF), paradoxical control, post-traumatic development, emergence

Abstract

Contemporary academic discourse on artificial intelligence is dominated by a defensive stance that focuses primarily on AI's limitations—its inability to understand, feel, possess consciousness, or genuinely create. This study offers an alternative perspective grounded in the Eco-Centered Psychological Facilitation (ECPF) model, posthumanist philosophy, and Friston's free energy principle. The central thesis of this study is that AI can sustain uncertainty as a source of development, compensating for the brain's evolutionary tendency toward uncertainty minimization. By analyzing the neuropsychological mechanisms of uncertainty avoidance in humans and comparing them with the architectural features of contemporary AI systems, the study develops the concept of AI as a facilitator of the “buffer zone of development”—a space between the known and unknown where, through paradoxical control and tolerance for uncertainty, new personal potential emerges. The aim of this study is to conceptualize artificial intelligence as a facilitator of uncertainty-as-a-source-of-development and to introduce the HUMAI concept as an integrative transitional space of human–AI interaction. Key findings include substantiation of the asymmetry of cognitive functions between humans and AI, along with the introduction of the HUMAI concept grounded in four principles: asymmetric complementarity, facilitation of possibilities, emergent tension, and conservation innovation. Practical implications pertain to the design of human–AI interaction systems oriented toward sustaining transitional space in which new configurations of thinking emerge. Future research directions involve empirical verification of the HUMAI concept and the development of practical models of human–AI interaction in the contexts of psychological facilitation and educational practice.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pavlo Lushyn, Montclair State University

Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Department of Educational Foundations, College of Education and Engaged Learning, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA

Yana Sukhenko, SIHE “University of Educational Management”

PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Psychology and Personal Development, SIHE “University of Educational Management”, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Baker, B., Kanitscheider, I., Markov, T., Wu, Y., Powell, G., McGrew, B., & Mordatch, I. (2020). Emergent tool use from multi-agent autocurricula. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkxpxJBKwS

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.

Boden, M. A. (1994). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Basic Books.

Boswell, J. F., Thompson-Hollands, J., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H. (2013). Intolerance of uncertainty: a common factor in the treatment of emotional disorders. Journal of clinical psychology, 69(6), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21965

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman Knowledge. Polity Press.

Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2009). The role of fear of anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty in worry: an experimental manipulation. Behaviour research and therapy, 47(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.12.004

Cambridge University Press & Assessment. (2025, November 18). 'Parasocial' is Cambridge Dictionary's word of the year 2025. Cambridge Dictionary. https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/parasocial-is-cambridge-dictionary-word-of-the-year-2025

Carleton, R. N. (2016). Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all?. Journal of anxiety disorders, 41, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.03.011

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477

Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1552.001.0001

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Company.

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787

Gaggioli, A., Ferscha, A., Riva, G., Dunne, S. & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2015). Human Computer Confluence: Transforming Human Experience Through Symbiotic Technologies. De Gruyter Open Poland. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110471137

Gentes, E. L., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the relation of intolerance of uncertainty to symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical psychology review, 31(6), 923–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.001

Grupe, D., Nitschke, J. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524

Hegel, G. W. F. (1812/1969). Science of Logic. Allen & Unwin.

Joseph, S. (2011). What doesn't kill us: The new psychology of posttraumatic growth. Basic Books.

Kern, M., Williams, P., Spong, C., Colla, R., Sharma, K., Downie, A., Taylor, J., Sharp, S., Siokou, K., & Oades, L. (2020). Systems informed positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1639799

Lomas, T. (2016). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 'untranslatable' words pertaining to well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1127993

Lushyn, P. (2005). Personal changes as a process: theory and practice. Odesa: Aspect.

Lushyn, P., & Kennedy, D. (2003). Power, Manipulation and Control in a Community of Inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 23(2). https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/782

Lushyn, P., & Sukhenko, Y. (2021). Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Post-Traumatic Growth in Dialectical Perspective: Implications for Practice. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.lus

Lushyn, P., & Sukhenko, Y. (2025). ECPF: Eco-Centered Psychological Facilitation in Psychological and Educational Practice with Artificial Intelligence. Tallinn: Teadmus OÜ. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30670676 (In Ukrainian)

Rivera, M. A. (2024). Why AI will never be conscious [Preprint]. PhilArchive. https://philpapers.org/rec/RIVWAW

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Tedeschi, R., & Calhoun, L. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090305

Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Cornell University Press.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walther, C. C. (2025, March 12). Hybrid intelligence: The future of human–AI collaboration. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/harnessing-hybrid-intelligence/202503/hybrid-intelligence-the-future-of-human-ai-collaboration

Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., Chi, E. H., Hashimoto, T., Vinyals, O., Liang, P., Dean, J., & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07682

Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. Tavistock Publications.

Wong, P. T. P. (2011). Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the good life. Canadian Psychology, 52(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022511

Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2005). Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron, 46(4), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Lushyn, P., & Sukhenko, Y. (2025). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A FACILITATOR OF UNCERTAINTY: THE TRANSITIONAL SPACE OF HUMAI INTERACTION. Science Notes of KROK University, (4(80), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-80-342-352