ECONOMICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE ESG CONCEPT AND RESOURCE EFFICIENCY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-79-153-165

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, ESG concept, sustainable development, environmental responsibility, internal corporate responsibility, social efficiency, responsibility to communities, corporate governance, corporate volunteering, circular economy, decarbonization

Abstract

The research method is a comprehensive assessment of the environmental performance of transnational corporations in 2020–2024 through the prism of a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and an increase in resource efficiency, close attention to the spheres of recovery of recovered energy, repeated water recovery and recycling of waste. Particular attention is paid to identifying the dynamics of change in corporate strategic approaches to managing the carbon footprint and integrating the principles of steel development and the circular economy.

The methodological basis for the investigation is a thorough and clear analysis of the corporate non-financial information of leading transnational corporations. Vicorista methods: regular analysis – to assess the dynamics of key environmental indicators (Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3, water recycling, waste recycling, energy recovery); structural-dynamic analysis – to identify trends and patterns in changes in indicators; an indicative approach – to determine the level of environmental performance of other corporations and the leveling of their strategies; system approach - to integrate the results into a single model for assessing environmental performance.

The article presents a systematic analysis of the environmental responsibility of leading multinational corporations in 2020–2024 using an integrated approach to assessing greenhouse gas emissions, sustainable resource use, and the integration of circular economy principles. Direct (Scope 1), indirect, related to the consumption of purchased energy (Scope 2 – location-based and market-based), as well as indirect emissions in value chains (Scope 3) were investigated. Particular attention is paid to key environmental indicators: the share of renewable energy, the volume of water reuse, and the level of waste recycling, which allows assessing the comprehensive effectiveness of the corporate environmental strategy. Based on the analysis of data from 11 international corporations (Apple Inc., Nvidia Corp., Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems Inc., Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer Inc., Amgen Inc., Ecolab Inc., Caterpillar Inc., CRH.), both progressive practices of decarbonization and resource management were identified, as well as problematic aspects, including high indirect emissions, unstable water use and fluctuations in waste recycling rates. The study demonstrates the relationship between scientifically based climate goal setting and their implementation in corporate practice, identifies leaders in environmental efficiency and provides an empirical basis for developing strategies to reduce carbon footprint, integrate circular approaches and increase the resilience of business processes. The results obtained have practical significance for the formation of corporate sustainable development policies and the alignment of corporate strategies with global climate initiatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Petro Bannikov, KROK University

Doctoral student, KROK University,  Kyiv, Ukrain

References

Грішнова, О. А., & Ольшанська, Я. В. (2010). Взаємозв’язок цінностей людини й цінностей організації в корпоративній системі. Формування ринкової економіки. Соціально-трудові відносини: теорія і практика, том 1, 223-232.

Харазішвілі, Ю. М., & Грішнова, О. А. (2018). Якість життя в системі соціальної безпеки України: індикатори, рівень, загрози. Економіка України, (11–12), 157–171.

Amgen Inc. (2025). 2024 sustainability highlights report. p. 23. URL: https://www.amgen.com/responsibility/2024-sustainability-highlights-report

Amgen Inc. (2025). Environmental sustainability data – 2024 summary of datap. 4. URL: https://www.amgen.com/responsibility/-/media/Themes/CorporateAffairs/amgen-com/amgen-com/downloads/responsibility-report/2024_summary_of_data.pdf

Apple Inc. (2024). Environmental progress report 2024. URL: https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2024.pdf

Caterpillar Inc. (2024). 2024 Sustainability Report: Goals & Progress. URL: https://www.caterpillar.com/en/company/sustainability/sustainability-report/goals-progress.html

Caterpillar Inc. (2025). 2024 Sustainability Report. URL: https://www.caterpillar.com/en/company/sustainability/sustainability-report.html

Cisco Systems, Inc. (2025). CDP. In ESG Hub: Governance – Frameworks. URL: https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/about/csr/esg-hub/governance/frameworks/cdp.html

CRH. (2022). Sustainability performance report 2022. URL: https://www.crh.com/media/4748/crh-2022-sustainability-performance-report_interactive.pdf

CRH. (2025). Sustainability performance report 2024. URL: https://www.crh.com/media/news-insights/sustainability-performance-report

Ecolab Inc. (2024). 2024 Growth & Impact Report. St. Paul, MN: Ecolab Inc. p. 18. URL: https://www.ecolab.com/-/media/Widen/Sustainability/Corporate-Sustainability-Report/2024/Ecolab-2024-Growth--Impact-Report.pdf

Elroi, H., Zbigniew, G., Wójcik-Czerniawska, A., & Szewczyk, P. (2023). Enhancing waste resource efficiency: Circular economy for sustainability and energy conversion. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1303792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1303792

Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). Scope 1 and Scope 2 inventory guidance. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. URL: https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/scope-1-and-scope-2-inventory-guidance

Glenk, K., & Rehdanz, K. (2025). Corporate carbon accounting: Current practices and opportunities for research. Mannheim Institute of Sustainable Energy Studies. https://www.uni-mannheim.de/media/Einrichtungen/mises/Dokumente/Glenk__2025__Corporate_Carbon_Accounting.pdf

Green Digest. (2024). Evaluating a company’s impact: The case of Pfizer. URL: https://www.greendigest.co/p/pfizer-environmental-and-social-impact

Heikkala, E. (2024). Scope 2 emissions: market-based and location-based emissions calculation. URL: https://biocode.io/scope-2-emissions-market-based-and-location-based/

Johnson & Johnson. (2024). 2024 CDP corporate questionnaire. New Brunswick. URL: https://healthforhumanityreport.jnj.com/2024/_assets/downloads/jnj-2024-cdp-climate-change.pdf

Johnson & Johnson. (2024). Health for humanity report 2024. New Brunswick. URL: https://healthforhumanityreport.jnj.com/2024/_assets/downloads/johnson-johnson-2024-health-for-humanity-report.pdf JNJ.com+6jjsnack.com+6s203.q4cdn.com+6

Johnson & Johnson. (2025). Independent limited assurance report. Malvern, PA: ERM Certification & Verification Services. URL: https://healthforhumanityreport.jnj.com/2024/_assets/downloads/jnj-2024-health-for-humanity-environmental-data-assurance.pdf

Kharazishvili, Y., Bilan, Y., Sukhodolia, O., Grishnova, O., & Mishchuk, H. (2025). Scientific and strategic foresighting: The trajectory of sustainable development (on the example of Ukraine’s energy security). Sustainable Futures, 9, 100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100580

Kharazishvili, Y., Lyashenko, V., Grishnova, O., Hutsaliuk, O., Petrova, I., Kalinin, O. (2023). Modeling of priority institutional measures to overcome threats to sustainable development of the region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1269, 012023. https://doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012023

Klaaßen, L., & Stoll, C. (2021). Harmonizing corporate carbon footprints. Nature Communications, 12(1), 6186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26349-x

Microsoft Corporation. (2024). Environmental sustainability report FY2024. Santa Clara. URL: https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/msc/documents/presentations/CSR/Microsoft-2024-Environmental-Sustainability-Report.pdf

Myskiv, H., & Ivanytskyi, R. (2024). Dekarbonizatsiia yak zaporuka staloho rozvytku: vyklyky i perspektyvy YeS ta Ukrayiny [Decarbonization as a guarantee of sustainable development: Challenges and prospects for the EU and Ukraine]. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(56), 365–381. URL: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.56.2024.4397

NVIDIA Corporation. (2024). FY2024 corporate sustainability report. Santa Clara. URL: https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/Solutions/documents/FY2024-NVIDIA-Corporate-Sustainability-Report.pdf

Pfizer Inc. (2024). Climate change position statement. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc. p. 2. URL: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/about/Climate_Change_Position_Statement_December_2024.pdf

Pfizer Inc. (2025). 2024 impact report New York, NY: Pfizer Inc. pp. 45, 53. URL: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/Pfizer_2024_Impact_Report-Performance_Data_02JUN2025.pdf

Procter & Gamble Co. (2024). GHG emissions data 2024. Cincinnati, OH: Procter & Gamble Co. URL: https://www.pginvestor.com/esg/environmental/climate/default.aspx

Procter & Gamble Co. (2024). Water positive strategy. URL: https://idadesal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/PG-Water-Positive.pdf

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Bannikov, P. (2025). ECONOMICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE ESG CONCEPT AND RESOURCE EFFICIENCY. Science Notes of KROK University, (3(79), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-79-153-165