EFFECTIVENESS OF THE APPLICATION OF CAPITAL TOOLS OF MACROPRUDENTIAL POLICY IN ANTI-CRISIS REGULATION OF THE NATIONAL BANKING SECTOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-78-124-131

Keywords:

macroprudential policy, capital buffers, systemic risks, anti-crisis regulation, dynamic provisions, banking sector

Abstract

Previous financial and economic crises prove the key role of macroprudential regulation of the financial sector in preventing the accumulation of systemic risks. One of the main instruments of such regulation is the means of direct and indirect influence on capital. The relevant regulatory and legal acts of the National Bank of Ukraine determine the possibility for the regulator to establish dynamic capital buffers, which are based on the regulatory capital adequacy ratio. However, due to the negative impact of the SARS COVID-2019 pandemic and the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into the territory of Ukraine, there is no practical experience in applying these instruments, which confirms the relevance of studying their effectiveness. The article presents the results of a study of the effectiveness of the implementation of capital instruments of macroprudential policy for the purpose of anti-crisis regulation of the national banking sector. The hypothesis of the study is that capital buffers undoubtedly contribute to ensuring financial stability due to an increase in the regulatory capital of banks, however, they have a slight countercyclical effect due to a weak transmission mechanism. Based on the construction of a vector autoregressive model (VAR), the author proved that the bank's regulatory capital includes a procyclical component in the form of reserves for impairment of credit debt, which affects the size of regulatory capital and, as a result, the value of the regulatory capital adequacy ratio through the bank's financial result. The results of the assessment of the transmission channel of capital buffers indicate the presence of theoretical justification and at the same time indicate the absence of an applied effect. The obtained research results allow us to substantiate the feasibility of introducing dynamic reserving as a more effective countercyclical tool of macroprudential regulation. The prospects for further research are aimed at developing specific recommendations for optimizing state macroprudential policy and applying the most effective tools to counteract the accumulation of systemic risks in the banking sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Pieikov, KROK University

Postgraduate student of the Department of National Economy and Finance, KROK University, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Akram, Q. F. (2014). Macro effects of capital requirements and macroprudential policy, Economic Modelling, vol 2, 77-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.05.033 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Behm, M., Hasselman, R., & Wachtel, P. (2016). Procyclical Capital Regulation and Lending. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 919-955. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43869121 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Jiménez, G., & Saurina, J. (2006). Credit cycles, credit risk, and prudential regulation. International Journal of Central Banking. No. 2 (2), pp. 65-98. URL: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/events/rtf05JimenezSaurina.pdf (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Kai Lin L.K. (2020). The cyclical patterns of capital buffers: evidence from Japanese banks. Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management, Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 49-68. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26888540 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Kishan, R.P., & Opiela, T.P. (2000). Bank Size, Bank Capital, and the Bank Lending Channel. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. Ohio State University Press. Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 121-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2601095 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Mizen, P., Rubio, M., & Turner, Ph. (2018). Macroprudential policy and practice. Cambridge University Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304429 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Repullo, R., & Suarez, J. (2013). The Procyclical Effects of Bank Capital Regulation. The Review of Financial Studies, 26, 452-490. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs118 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Warjiyo, P., & Juhro, S.M. (2022). Central bank policy mix: issues, challenges, and policy responses. Springer. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6827-2 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Валовий внутрішній продукт у фактичних цінах. Державна служба статистики (2024). URL: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Національний банк України. (2001). Про затвердження Інструкції про порядок регулювання діяльності банків в Україні (Постанова №368 від 28 серпня 2001 року). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0841-01#Text (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Наглядова статистика. Національний банк України (2024). URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/supervision-statist (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Науменкова, С.В., & Міщенко В.І. (2015). Макропруденційні інструменти в механізмі забезпечення фінансової стабільності. Фінанси України. № 10. С. 53–76. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Fu_2015_10_5 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025);

Соколовська, І.П., & Пєйков, О.В. (2024). Національний феномен рентабельності банків в умовах війни. Бізнес-Інформ. №2-2024, с. 184-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-184-193 (дата звернення: 05.04.2025).

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Pieikov, O. (2025). EFFECTIVENESS OF THE APPLICATION OF CAPITAL TOOLS OF MACROPRUDENTIAL POLICY IN ANTI-CRISIS REGULATION OF THE NATIONAL BANKING SECTOR. Science Notes of KROK University, (2(78), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2025-78-124-131