FEMALE ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION AND DYNAMICS OF GDP PER CAPITA IN EU MEMBER-STATES

Oksana Vinska; Volodymyr Tokar

doi:10.31732/2663-2209-2021-62-19-26

Authors

Oksana Vinska Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
Volodymyr Tokar Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2021-62-19-26

Keywords:

economic development, economic participation and opportunity, EU member-states, gender equality, gender gap, GDP per capita

Abstract

The article sheds light on female emancipation in EU member-states being the magnet for Ukraine due to their living standards and values. The aim of the article is to analyze the economic activity of women and the dynamics of GDP per capita in EU member states. Gender equality is the integral part of EU internal and external policies being an overwhelming concept embracing many dimensions, including the economic one. The EU concentrates on engaging more females in the official labor market with guarantees of equal with males salaries, supporting work-life balance, voluntary and compulsory gender quotas in business and politics, ensuring safety for women at home and workplaces. A wide range of publications tries to persuade that there is a correlation between female economic emancipation and national economic advancement demonstrating that gender equality is only a new method guaranteeing additional profits for corporations and tax revenues for governments. The authors of this research paper apply Spearman coefficient to determine whether there is any correlation between economic growth and economic participation and opportunities for women, namely GDP per capita at current market prices and values of economic gender gap sub-index of EU member-states in 2016-2020. The average growth of GDP per capita in EU member-states equaled 11.6 percent in 2016-2020. Ireland showed the maximum relative increase of 29.1 percent, while Greece, Italy, Spain, and Sweden experienced the decline. The average gender gap in economic participation and opportunity in EU member-states decreased by 0.018 points in 2016-2020. The calculations show that the Spearman correlation coefficient is statistically insignificant. Therefore, economic gender equality by itself is not enough for stimulating economic growth and should be viewed as an indisputable human right and accompanied by fostering gender equality in other spheres, such as education, health care and politics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Vinska, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

PhD (Economics), associate professor, associate professor of european economy and business departmetnt

Volodymyr Tokar, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of sciences (Economics), professor, leading specialist grant projects department

References

Agarwal, B. Gender Equality, Food Security and the Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018. 34, 26-32.

Closing the Gap: The EU Pay Transparency Directive. URL: https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2021/03/eu-pay-transparency-directive.

GDP per Capita in EU Member-states. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/national-accounts/data/database.

Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/gender-equality-strategy_en.

Global Gender Gap Report 2017. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf.

Global Gender Gap Report 2018. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf.

Global Gender Gap Report 2020. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf.

Global Gender Gap Report 2021. URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021.

Johnson N. L., Kovarik C., Meinzen-Dick R., Njuki J., Quisumbing A. Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development: Lessons from Eight Projects. World Development. 2016. 83. 295-311.

Kabeer N. Gender Equality, Economic Growth, and Women’s Agency: the “Endless Variety” and “Monotonous Similarity” of Patriarchal Constrains. Taylor and Francis Journals Feminist Economics. 2016. Vol. 22. Issue 1. 295-321. URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13545701.2015.1090009?scroll=top&needAccess=true.

Mitra A., Bang J.T., Biswas A. Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is It Equality of Opportunity or Equality of Outcomes? Taylor and Francis Journals Feminist Economics. 2015. Vol. 21. Issue 1. 110-135. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v21y2015i1p110-135.html.

Portalatin J. Technology Could Destroy More Jobs for Women Than Men. URL: http://fortune.com/2017/01/28/automation-workers-women-pay-gap/.

Theriault V., Smale M., Haider H. How Does Gender Affect Sustainable Intensification of Cereal Production in the West African Sahel? Evidence from Burkina Faso. World Development. 2017. 92. 177-191.

Вінська О.Й., Токар В.В. Взаємозалежність гендерної рівності та інноваційної конкурентоспроможності країн ЄС. Глобальні та національні проблеми економіки. 2016. № 12. С. 18-22. URL: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/12-2016/6.pdf.

Вінська О.Й., Токар В.В. Гендерна рівність та соціально-економічний розвиток країн-членів Європейського Союзу. Східна Європа: економіка, бізнес та управління. 2016. №2. С. 32-36. URL: http://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/2_2016/08.pdf.

Вінська О.Й., Токар В.В. Політична емансипація жінок як фактор економічного розвитку країн ЄС. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. 2016. Вип. 18. Ч. 1. С. 17-21. URL: http://www.ej.kherson.ua/journal/economic_18/1/5.pdf.